Thread:YellowJelly/@comment-27674244-20190308223448/@comment-38535605-20190308225932

"two of the three public comments below that mention it disagree that it should be at the top of the page" You and your other account, both of which were arguing in bad faith.

"responses to your chart when it's been posted on the board itself have been mixed, even mostly negative" I addressed those criticisms, and made them understand why some things are the way they are (they just had to read the description).

"clearly this is an 'alternative' essentials chart at best" It's MORE of an essentials, actually, since it covers more musical ground. The previous ""essentials"" didn't even have classical.

"it does not represent the population of /mu/ or what music they enjoy or are inclined to discuss on the board"

It's a "/mu/ essentials" chart. The previous chart was not a proper essentials chart because it had no classical music, and no traditional music either.

"has never been the way /mu/ engages with music" If that were the case then most of the metal and electronic sections should have been cut from the chart. But they haven't. That's becasue the chart is not "what /mu/ likes most", but "what some user on /mu/ thought were essential recordings". This is the same thing, except more complete, and therefore better.

The previous chart shouldn't be at the top anyways as its redundant, I'm just keeping it there because this other user argued in good faith in less than three reverts that both should be kept, which I found to be acceptable.